We need to reconceive probability for deterministic systems. In doing so we run up against the limits of introspection
Some thoughts on why the transcendent is crucial to understanding religion, and its implications for the ‘God’ debate, theology and more.
Some things you know as part of your existence, and provide a building block for further knowledge. Yet if these a priori truths exist, why isn’t it obvious what they are? After all, Philosophers still can’t agree what are reasonable axioms for philosophising.
The answer sheds light on why Philosophers don’t agree on anything, and the current limits of Philosophy.
Are you sure you understand what people say? Unfortunately, you cannot be certain.
And the problems of Philosophy